Giving Huan’s Botanicals a home beyond Instagram messages.

PROJECT TYPE

PROJECT TYPE

UX Research, IA, UI Design

TEAM

Independent (Solo)

MY ROLE

ROLE

UX/UI Designer

DURATION

1 month (2026)

OVERVIEW

HUAN's Botanicals is a vegetable-tanned leather studio moving from Taiwan into a North American market. The old website sold ready-stock and commissioned pieces from the same page, leaving visitors unable to tell which path applied to them.

PROBLEM

One shop page, three overlapping categories.

With North America now the priority market and bespoke commission the offer it’s built around, browsing needed to be rebuilt from the customer’s decision outward, not from how the products happened to be sourced.

The old Shop & Custom Orders page mixed online and offline channels into a single page. Online purchasing alone split into three paths, bespoke commissions, ready-made pieces, and Pinkoi listings, easy for a visitor to confuse. The brand's in-person presence, at markets and exhibitions, deserved its own page rather than being folded into the mix.

01

Four paths, one page, all at equal weight

02

No clear priority for the main offer

03

Classification followed supply, not intent

The old Homepage

The old Shop & Custom Orders page

RESEARCH

User Interviews: Browsing comes before buying.

Interviews with three collectors showed commission willingness is a spectrum, not a binary, from passive certainty-seekers to proactive risk-takers. But all three shared one behaviour: they browse the work first, not stock status or category labels. Trust accrues by watching pieces over time, never in a single sales moment.

Interviews three collectors showed commission willingness is a spectrum, not a binary, from passive certainty-seekers to proactive risk-takers. But all three shared one behavior: they browse the work first, not a stock status or
a category label. Trust accrues by watching pieces over time, never in a single sales moment.

Key insight

The site needed to support browsing as the main behavior, not treat it as a step before buying.

Competitive Analysis: Commission needs its own page, and its own trust-building.

Analysis of four high-end maker brands confirmed the direction: premium needs two separate paths, not one. Mixing ready-stock and commission in one shop dilutes the offer. Hesitant clients also need proof before they'll commit, not a blank form on arrival. The brands that converted best led with process, then real client stories, then a form.

Key insight

Commission was pulled into its own page, built around setting expectations early, showing proof from past clients, and keeping the form as simple as possible.

IA: Five entries, each mapped to why a visitor arrives.

The final navigation splits Shop & Custom Orders into Works and Commission, folds Gallery into Milestones to keep the brand's timeline of activity, and merges Press into About since only one of four press pieces had reach beyond Taiwan. In-person markets and exhibitions aren't reflected in the navigation yet, since that side of the brand hasn't launched, but the plan is to fold them into About and the homepage once it does.

Work

browse all; tagged ready / made-to-order

Commission

for those who want to start from scratch

Milestones

the brand’s timeline of work

About

the maker, plus a press block

Contact

get in touch

Key insight

Each entry maps to one clear reason a visitor arrives, not one product type.

DESIGN

Split the site. Keep the grid whole.

Competitive analysis confirmed it: premium needs two separate paths, not one. Commission was pulled into its own page, never mixed with browsing.

Within Works, both sit in the same grid because that’s how visitors actually browse: they scan pieces first, not “in stock” or “made to order” first. Status stays a tag on the card, not a separate section to choose between.

Decision 01

Decision 01

Homepage, one piece leads

Decision 02

Decision 02

Works page, one shared grid

Decision 03

Decision 03

Commission page, proof before pitch

The built, and the system behind it.

Live Prototype

Design System

WHAT I LEARNED

Research still matters, even on a redesign

My first pass at this redesign came from talking to the client alone and fixing what I could see was broken on the existing site. I kept the same IA. Something still felt off, though I couldn't quite name it at the time. Talking to three existing users and looking at competitors changed that. I realised the IA itself was the problem, not the surface details I'd been polishing. That's what led me to the structure this project ended up with.

I don't think a redesign needs the same depth of user research a new product or a new assumption would. But I've learned it still needs some. My own experience as a designer, however informed, couldn't cover the full range of a user's mental model on its own.

My first pass at this redesign came from talking to the client alone and fixing what I could see was broken on the existing site. I kept the same IA. Something still felt off, though I couldn't quite name it at the time. Talking to three existing users and looking at competitors changed that.
I realised the IA itself was the problem, not the surface details I'd been polishing. That's what led me to the structure this project ended up with. I don't think a redesign needs the same depth of user research a new product or a new assumption would. But I've learned it still needs some. My own experience as a designer, however informed, couldn't cover the full range of a user's mental model on its own.