Consolidating navigation and content priority for a university research institute

Consolidating navigation and content priority for a university research institute

PROJECT TYPE

Website Redesign

TEAM

4 design interns

ROLE

IA, WordPress

TIMELINE

Jul – Oct 2025

OVERVIEW

ARMI, the Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute at Monash University, serves researchers, prospective students, donors, and media through one website. The existing site buried the institute’s core research value beneath redundant navigation and administrative content.

ARMI, the Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute at Monash University, serves researchers, prospective students, donors,
and media through one website. The existing site buried the institute’s core research value beneath redundant navigation and administrative content.

WHAT I DID

I audited the site's navigation and content hierarchy, identifying three structural problems, then restructured the IA to lead with research. I also implemented this structure in WordPress (with a teammate), adapting components like buttons and templates within the constraints of the existing theme.

I audited the site's navigation and content hierarchy, identifying three structural problems, then restructured the IA to lead with research.
I also implemented this structure in WordPress (with a teammate), adapting components like buttons and templates within the constraints of the existing theme.

THE CHALLENGE

Three overlapping problems, buried research value.

01

Navigation inconsistency

Redundant navigation bars and inconsistent dropdown patterns fragment the user journey and make key information difficult to locate.

02

Misaligned content priority

Secondary content (Careers/Donations) over-prioritized, burying core research value and disrupting user intent.

03

Cognitive overload

Repeated content and lack of segmentation increase cognitive load by forcing users to filter through visual noise.

The original ARMI homepage, with the three structural issues annotated

RESEARCH & INSIGHTS

Four interviews surfaced three consistent structural problems.

Based on four user interviews, key issues included confusing navigation, low visibility of research, and limited public engagement. These findings aligned closely with stakeholder concerns.

Key Findings

Overcrowded navigation

Inconsistent menus made it difficult for users to find research groups and key information.

Low visibility of research

Researchers and groups lack clear profiles and structure.

Limited public engagement

Opportunities for students and collaborators are unclear or hidden.

Design Focus

These insights informed the following design focus:

  • Simplify navigation to reduce duplication and cognitive load

  • Clarify content hierarchy across public, academic, and industry audiences

  • Prioritise research groups and people in top-level navigation

Research & user interviews conducted by other team memebers.

RESTRUCTURING THE NAVIGATION LOGIC

Three principles guided the new sitemap.

Consolidated Research

Merged 3 scattered entry points into a single ‘Research’ category to help users find core content faster.

Prioritised Intent

Relocated News & Events to ‘About’ to prevent secondary info from competing for attention.

Minimised Noise

Moved Careers and Contact links to the footer to declutter the header and highlight mission-critical pathways.

OUTCOME

A homepage that leads with research, not admin.

Research now leads the homepage, not donations, not admin content.

BEFORE (BUSINESS-CENTRIC)

High priority given to Donations and Recruitment needs

Research buried below promotional and event content, with no visual priority

9 competing top-level nav entries

AFTER (VALUE-CENTRIC)

Scientific discovery and team profiles immediately accessible

Prospective students and collaborators save 3 to 4 clicks to reach research data

3 clear nav entries: About, Research, Study and Training

From Design to Reality

The existing WordPress theme imposed real limitations such as button text colour couldn't be customised, and predefined templates restricted layout flexibility. Some design decisions couldn't be implemented exactly as intended. Where this happened, I adapted: outlined text-links replaced buttons to preserve visual hierarchy and clarity within what the theme could support.

Structure is a form of trust.

For a research institute, the site’s structure is itself a credibility signal. Consolidating navigation and reordering content priority didn’t just make the site easier to use, it changed what visitors believe ARMI values most, moving research from something buried in the structure.